Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Destanee Aiava vs Alison Van Uytvanck Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Aiava vs Uytvanck analysis and find out who is favored!
Destanee Aiava vs Alison Van Uytvanck Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Aiava 0 - 0 Uytvanck
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Aiava has won 49.28% of points on their second serve, while Uytvanck has won 48.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Aiava, in recent form, has won 54.35% of their opponent's second serve points, while Uytvanck has won 55.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.26% and 36.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Aiava has saved 56.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Uytvanck has saved 58.39% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Aiava has won 67.09% of matches played (W/L 53/ 26), with Uytvanck winning 69.23% (W/L 18/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Aiava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 46/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Uytvanck has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 142/ 61), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 103/ 98).
- Player level: In the last year, Aiava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.92% of matches (W/L 51/ 23), where as Uytvanck has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72% of matches (W/L 18/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Aiava has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.66 while Uytvanck has played against players with an average rank of 282.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Aiava has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Uytvanck has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Aiava has converted 49.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Uytvanck has converted 43.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
186
Rank
147
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
397
Rank
37
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
60% (222-145)
Career Total W/L
60% (397-265)
57% (17-13)
YTD W/L
65% (13-7)
$127,649
Career Prize Money
$2,102,898
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Destanee Aiava | Alison Van Uytvanck |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (17/13) | 65% (13/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (38/30) | 60% (28/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (331/303) | 53% (231/205) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 62% (16/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 64% (7/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 72 | 63 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:23 | 1:42:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 219.67 | 281.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1326/2087) | 58% (812/1393) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (842/1326) | 68% (555/812) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (375/761) | 48% (279/581) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (107/217) | 44% (74/170) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (849/1978) | 43% (619/1432) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (15/10) | 68% (13/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (17/30) | 67% (12/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 25% (8/2) |
Destanee Aiava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Ankita Raina
Player
Destanee Aiava
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(0) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Evialina Laskevich
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
78%
(
29 of
37)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Maria Mateas
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Destanee Aiava
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
92)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irina Maria Bara
Player
Destanee Aiava
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Destanee Aiava
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Destanee Aiava
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Haruka Kaji
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Yuki Naito
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Alison Van Uytvanck Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
13
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
51%
(
47 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
3
Aces
4
12
Double Faults
6
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Anastasiya Soboleva
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-7(4) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Sada Nahimana
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Malene Helgo
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Gloria Ceschi
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Viola Turini
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Aiava Vs Uytvanck Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
